Answers people would reasonably want before trusting the tool.
This FAQ is meant to make IStreamHype feel easier to understand. It focuses on what the product does, how it handles publishing, and how it is intended to behave if offered publicly.
This FAQ is meant to make IStreamHype feel easier to understand. It focuses on what the product does, how it handles publishing, and how it is intended to behave if offered publicly.
It helps identify likely highlight moments from live streams, save them as clips, organize them in a library, generate captions, and prepare them for publishing to connected platforms.
It is designed for creators, editors, or operators who want a faster path from live-stream moment to short-form content.
The workflow is centered around live-stream sources like Twitch and Kick, with connected publishing flows for platforms such as TikTok and YouTube.
Not necessarily. The current site and legal pages are structured so the product looks complete and compliant if it is made public later.
No. The intended pattern is to connect TikTok through OAuth rather than by collecting and storing your platform password.
No. The product should be understood as a creator workflow tool. Automation can help with capture and preparation, but publishing should remain user-authorized and platform-compliant.
Because platforms are more comfortable with tools that help creators prepare content than with tools that behave like spam infrastructure.
For the current described use case, `video.upload` is the cleanest scope to request first.
Only the minimum needed to support stream monitoring, clip organization, connected account authorization, and upload workflow operation.
No. The stated policy is that personal data is not sold, and data sharing is limited to service providers or platform APIs needed for the workflow.
That is the intended public posture, yes. The privacy policy states that users may request deletion or disconnection of stored account data.
Because trust matters early. These pages make it clear how the product is meant to behave if it becomes public and help create a more professional foundation now.
No. It is meant to reduce repetitive work so human judgment can be spent on selecting, editing, and packaging the best moments.
No. It helps surface likely interesting moments faster, but quality still depends on the stream content, packaging, and editorial choices.
Yes. The entire public-facing framing here is that IStreamHype should operate as a user-controlled creator tool that respects platform rules and human review.